LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology

Original articles

ReproduceMe: Lessons from a pilot project on computational reproducibility

Daniel H. Baker, Mareike Berg, Kirralise J. Hansford, Bartholomew P.A. Quinn, Federico G. Segala, Erin L. Warden-English
- PDF
The many faces of early life adversity - Content overlap in validated assessment instruments as well as in fear and reward learning research

Alina Koppold, Julia Ruge, Tobias Hecker, Tina B. Lonsdorf
- PDF
How Close to the Mark Might Published Heritability Estimates Be?

Michael Maraun, Moritz Heene, Philipp Sckopke
- PDF
Knowing What We're Talking About Facilitating Decentralized, Unequivocal Publication of and Reference to Psychological Construct Definitions and Instructions

Gjalt-Jorn Peters, Rik Crutzen
- PDF
Evaluating the Replicability of Social Priming Studies

Erik Mac Giolla, Simon Karlsson, David A. Neequaye, Magnus Bergquist
- PDF
Distinguishing Between Models and Hypotheses: Implications for Significance Testing

David Trafimow
- PDF
Preregistration specificity and adherence: A review of preregistered gambling studies and cross-disciplinary comparison

Robert Heirene, Debi LaPlante, Eric Louderback, Brittany Keen, Marjan Bakker, Anastasia Serafimovska, Sally Gainsbury
- PDF
Beyond a Dream: The Practical Foundations of Disconnected Psychology

Dario Krpan
- PDF

Commentaries

The Untrustworthy Evidence in Dishonesty Research

František Bartoš
- PDF
Re-analysis of a meta-analysis about tryptophan and depression

Martin Plöderl
- PDF
Investigating Heterogeneity in (Social) Media Effects: Experience-Based Recommendations

Patti Valkenburg, Ine Beyens, Loes Keijsers
- PDF
How should we investigate variation in the relation between social media and well-being?

Niklas Johannes, Philipp K. Masur, Matti Vuorre, Andrew K. Przybylski
- PDF

Replication Reports

Associations between Goal Orientation and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies are Stable across Course Types, Underrepresented Minority Status, and Gender A Replication of Muis and Franco (2009)

Brendan Schuetze, Veronica Yan
- PDF

File-Drawer Reports

The Effect of Variety on Perceived Quantity Failures to Replicate Redden and Hoch (2009)

Lukas Röseler, Georg Felser, Jana Asberger, Astrid Schütz
- PDF

Special Topic

Responsible Research is also concerned with generalizability: Recognizing efforts to reflect upon and increase generalizability in hiring and promotion decisions in psychology

Roman Stengelin, Manuel Bohn, Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, Daniel Haun, Maleen Thiele, Moritz Daum, Elisa Felsche, Frankie Fong, Anja Gampe, Marta Giner Torréns, Sebastian Grueneisen, David Hardecker, Lisa Horn, Karri Neldner, Sarah Pope-Caldwell, Nils Schuhmacher
- PDF
Responsible assessment of what research? Beware of epistemic diversity!

Sven Ulpts
- PDF
Responsible research assessment in the area of quantitative methods research: A comment on Gärtner et al.

Holger Brandt, Mirka Henninger, Esther Ulitzsch, Kristian Kleinke, Thomas Schäfer
- PDF
Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology

Jakob Fink-Lamotte, Kevin Hilbert, Dorothée Bentz, Simon Blackwell, Jan R. Boehnke, Juliane Burghardt, Barbara Cludius, Johannes C. Ehrenthal, Moritz Elsaesser, Anke Haberkamp, Tanja Hechler, Anja Kräplin, Christian Paret, Lars Schulze, Sarah Wilker, Helen Niemeyer
- PDF
Comment on "Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”

Victor Auger, Nele Claes
- PDF
Research assessment using a narrow definition of “research quality” is an act of gatekeeping: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)

Tom Hostler
- PDF
Indicators for teaching assessment

Miriam Hansen, Julia Beitner, Holger Horz, Martin Schultze
- PDF
Valuing Preprints Must be Part of Responsible Research Assessment

Moin Syed
- PDF
Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes

Hannah Dames, Philipp Musfeld, Vencislav Popov, Klaus Oberauer, Gidon T. Frischkorn
- PDF
Responsible Research Assessment requires structural more than procedural reforms

Gidon T. Frischkorn
- PDF
Assessing rigor and impact of research software for hiring and promotion in psychology: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)

Andreas M. Brandmaier, Maximilian Ernst, Aaron Peikert
- PDF
Comment on: Responsible Research Assessment I and Responsible Research Assessment II

Erich H. Witte
- PDF
Interdisciplinary Value

Veli-Matti Karhulahti
- PDF
Commentary: “Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”

Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
- PDF
A broader view of research contributions: Necessary adjustments to DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology.

Gavin Brown
- PDF

Vol. 8 (2024)

Original articles

ReproduceMe: Lessons from a pilot project on computational reproducibility

The many faces of early life adversity - Content overlap in validated assessment instruments as well as in fear and reward learning research

How Close to the Mark Might Published Heritability Estimates Be?

Knowing What We're Talking About Facilitating Decentralized, Unequivocal Publication of and Reference to Psychological Construct Definitions and Instructions

Evaluating the Replicability of Social Priming Studies

Distinguishing Between Models and Hypotheses: Implications for Significance Testing

Preregistration specificity and adherence: A review of preregistered gambling studies and cross-disciplinary comparison

Beyond a Dream: The Practical Foundations of Disconnected Psychology

Commentaries

The Untrustworthy Evidence in Dishonesty Research

Re-analysis of a meta-analysis about tryptophan and depression

Investigating Heterogeneity in (Social) Media Effects: Experience-Based Recommendations

How should we investigate variation in the relation between social media and well-being?

Replication Reports

Associations between Goal Orientation and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies are Stable across Course Types, Underrepresented Minority Status, and Gender A Replication of Muis and Franco (2009)

File-Drawer Reports

The Effect of Variety on Perceived Quantity Failures to Replicate Redden and Hoch (2009)

Special Topic

Responsible Research is also concerned with generalizability: Recognizing efforts to reflect upon and increase generalizability in hiring and promotion decisions in psychology

Responsible assessment of what research? Beware of epistemic diversity!

Responsible research assessment in the area of quantitative methods research: A comment on Gärtner et al.

Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology

Comment on "Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”

Research assessment using a narrow definition of “research quality” is an act of gatekeeping: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)

Indicators for teaching assessment

Valuing Preprints Must be Part of Responsible Research Assessment

Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes

Responsible Research Assessment requires structural more than procedural reforms

Assessing rigor and impact of research software for hiring and promotion in psychology: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)

Comment on: Responsible Research Assessment I and Responsible Research Assessment II

Interdisciplinary Value

Commentary: “Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”

A broader view of research contributions: Necessary adjustments to DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology.

Make a Submission