Acronym Absurdity Constrains Psychological Science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2024.4140

Keywords:

acronyms, abbreviations, initialisms, absurdity, meta-science

Abstract

Everyone hates acronyms. This is known. This essay focuses on a somewhat different issue, called acronym absurdity, which is how acronyms can have the power to constrain discovery and advancement, thereby shaping science in undesirable ways. It is called acronym absurdity because the use of acronyms can sometimes lead to rather strange outcomes that any reasonable, mildly detached observer can only deem absurd. This essay focuses on two broad classes of the problem: how catchy acronyms lead to bizarre and limiting choices, and how acronyms can lead to modifications that betray their original intention. It is plainly obvious that the general practice around acronyms is absurd and should largely be abandoned.

References

Anda, R. F., Porter, L. E., & Brown, D. W. (2020). Inside the adverse childhood experience score: Strengths, limitations, and misapplications. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.009

Bethell, C., Jones, J., Gombojav, N., Linkenbach, J., & Sege, R. (2019). Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: Associations across adverse childhood experiences levels. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(11), e193007–e193007. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3007

Blockley, D. (2019). What can we learn about STEAM from bridges? In A. de la Garza & C. Travis (Eds.), The STEAM Revolution: Transdisci-plinary Approaches to Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Humanities and Mathematics (pp. 155–167). Springer International Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6_11

Brumback, R. A. (2009). ABRV (or Abbrevobabble revisited). Journal of Child Neurology, 24(12), 1477–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809340922

Cronholm, P. F., Forke, C. M., Wade, R., Bair-Merritt, M. H., Davis, M., Harkins-Schwarz, M., Pachter, L. M., & Fein, J. A. (2015). Adverse childhood experiences: Expanding the concept of adversity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.001

Deo, M. E. (2023). Better than BIPOC. Retrieved January 23, 2024, from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4381823

Diamond, S. (2019). Addressing the imagination gap through STEAMM+D and Indigenous knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1851–1856. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808679115

Fakim, N., & Macaulay, C. (2020). ’Don’t call me BAME’. BBC News. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53194376

Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8

Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Cai, H., & Brown, J. D. (2010). It’s not WEIRD, it’s WRONG: When Researchers Overlook uNderlying Genotypes, they will not detect universal processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000105

Garcia, S. E. (2020). Where did BIPOC come from? The New York Times. Retrieved July 3, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-bipoc.html

García Coll, C. (2022). Where do we come from. . . where are we heading? Reflections on the personal, the systemic, and the political. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(2), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12772

Grady, C. (2020). Why the term “BIPOC” is so complicated, explained by linguists. Retrieved May 23, 2026, from https://www.vox.com/2020/6/30/21300294/bipoc-what-does-it-mean-critical-race-linguistics-jonathan-rosa-deandra-miles-hercules

Hales, A. H., Williams, K. D., & Rector, J. (2017). Alienating the audience: How abbreviations hamper scientific communication. APS Observer, 30(2). Retrieved March 5, 2020, from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/alienating-the-audience-how-abbreviations-hamper-scientific-communication

Hallinen, J. (2020). STEM | description, development, & facts [Library Catalog: www.britannica.com]. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEM-education

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Hollenbeck, J. R., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

Kushlan, J. A. (1995). Use and abuse of abbreviations in technical communication. Journal of Child Neurology, 10(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389501000101

Lang, T. (2019). The long and the short of abbreviations. European Science Editing, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18018

Lee, E. (2015). The making of Asian America: A history. Simon; Schuster. Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407000442

Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782

Narayan, A. J., Rivera, L. M., Bernstein, R. E., Harris, W. W., & Lieberman, A. F. (2018). Positive childhood experiences predict less psychopathology and stress in pregnant women with childhood adversity: A pilot study of the benevolent childhood experiences (BCEs) scale. Child Abuse & Neglect, 78, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.022

Negriff, S. (2020). ACEs are not equal: Examining the relative impact of household dysfunction versus childhood maltreatment on mental health in adolescence. Social Science & Medicine, 245, 112696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112696

Rubin, M. (2017). When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128

Smith, S. D. (2017). Non-Black people of color perpetuate anti-Blackness too [Library Catalog: www.huffpost.com Section: Black Voices]. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/non-black-people-of-color-are-not-exempt-from-being_b_58bdb5dbe4b0ec3d5a6ba143

Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U.-K. (2022). Cultural psychology, diversity, and representation in open science. In K. C. McLean (Ed.), Cultural methods in psychology: Describing and transforming cultures (pp. 427–454). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093oso/9780190095949.003.0015

Vancouver, J. B. (2018). In defense of HARKing. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 73– 80. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.89

Vinyard, D. J., Zachary, C. E., Ananyev, G., & Dismukes, G. C. (2013). Thermodynamically accurate modeling of the catalytic cycle of photo synthetic oxygen evolution: A mathematical solution to asymmetric Markov chains. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1827(7), 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.04.008

Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582(7812), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038d41586-020-01751-5

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

Issue

Section

Questionable Research Ideas and Other Peculiarities